When Scientific Contradictions Are Lost in Translation
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2609.38621v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Two scientific findings can disagree without contradicting each other. Determining whether they conflict requires knowing whether they describe comparable measurements. We study how language models behave at this decision point. In a controlled task, we generate an unsatisfiable XOR constraint system and translate its constraints into scientific reports from different laboratories. One assignment satisfies more constraints, while another satisfies fewer but better matches expected biology. This creates a simple dilemma: does the model choose the assignment that best fits the constraints, or the one that better matches biological expectations? W
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
Related AI news
- Kaikki noudattivat ohjeita – Kukaan ei ollut vastuussaTivi · October 1, 2026
- China's chip-tool localization accelerates: ACM Research backlog jumps 88%DIGITIMES · October 1, 2026
- Decode-Latency Feedback Prefill: A Model-Free Controller and Its Generalization LimitsarXiv cs.AI · October 1, 2026
- ChartRevise: A Dataset and Evaluation Protocol for Exact Chart Editing via CodearXiv cs.AI · October 1, 2026
- Can an AI Agent Rediscover a Blaschke-Curve Invariant?arXiv cs.AI · October 1, 2026
- SimTrace: Grounded Multimodal User Trajectories Generation for Online User ModelingarXiv cs.AI · October 1, 2026