When Should a VLM Look? Paying Only for Visual Calls That Were Needed and Used
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2609.22910v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language agents that crop and zoom are trained with rewards that credit a successful tool call, yet a successful call does not show that the model needed to look or used the pixels it received. On our cold-start checkpoint only 10% to 12% of visual calls were both needed and used, and released agents make spurious calls 36% to 87% of the time on individual benchmarks. Outcome rewards, judge rewards, and branch probes each observe one side of this failure, and about two thirds of what an outcome reward pays goes to calls that were neither needed nor used. CounterCredit asks both questions of every image-returning call at its realized pre-
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
- Bild
Related AI news
- Do Existing Preconditioners Improve Biomedical Tabular Foundation Learning? An Empirical Study on TabPFN OptimizationarXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026
- 4DGS-JEPA: Temporally Compositional Joint-Embedding Prediction for Dynamic Gaussian SplattingarXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026
- An Accurate and Interpretable Hyper Graph Neural Network for GBM Survival PredictionarXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026
- Ovis-Embedding: Pushing the Frontiers of Universal Omni-Modal EmbeddingsarXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026
- X-Planner: Event-Structured Task Planning for Embodied IntelligencearXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026
- Lean Pool: An AI-Maintained Archive of Formalized MathematicsarXiv cs.AI · September 23, 2026