Who Verifies the Tools? How Warped Formatters Mislead Agents and Their Verifiers
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.32110v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agents and verifiers often rely on the text a tool prints, and that text can misrepresent what the tool actually did, even when the tool's computation is correct. We saw this happen in a production RAG research system used by the Pilsudski Institute in New York, where tool output formatters misled an agent into giving wrong or incomplete information to users. Each tool did its job correctly, but its output omitted search limits, result caps, or identifier namespaces. We also recreated an unlabeled estimate caught in code review before release. We studied whether these formatters misled agents and verifiers and how much the repaired wording help
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- Exclusive: Monzo founder Tom Blomfield backs AI agent startup Nous in $17m raiseSifted · October 26, 2026
- HSBC launches AI tool for corporate banking clientsTech in Asia · October 26, 2026
- A look at Toyota's robotics expansion, including its Walden spinoff and a $6.4B annual plan to deploy 400K factory robots, as it competes with Tesla and China (Financial Times)Techmeme · October 26, 2026
- Reproducible Evaluation as the Substrate for Safe Prompt Compression in Production AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 26, 2026
- PaperFormalizer: Author-in-the-Loop Autoformalization of Research Papers in LeanarXiv cs.AI · October 26, 2026
- Don't Forget What You Just Learned: Self-Directed Repair Turns Agent Mistakes Into Lasting LessonsarXiv cs.AI · October 26, 2026