A Human-Centred Approach to Benchmarking LLMs for Parenting Advice
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2608.14622v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: People are increasingly using large language models (LLMs) to seek advice, including for parenting. Parenting is a critical and socially sensitive domain. Thus, evaluating advice provided by LLMs requires indicators beyond aggregated information quality benchmarks to consider relational and behavioural elements of the responses. With a multi-dimensional rubric created by parenting experts, this paper evaluates 15 LLMs across 100 parenting scenarios in 2 languages (English and Chinese), using an LLM-as-a-judge method. Results show that aggregate scores can hide rubric item-specific weaknesses, models implicitly encourage different parenting styl
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
Related AI news
- Global AI Regulations for FAIR and Ethics in High-Risk Use Cases: A Comparative ReviewarXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026
- From Doyle to AGM: A Survey and an Implementation Roadmap for Belief ChangearXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026
- Position: Want Better ML Reviews? Stop Asking Nicely and Start Incentivizing with a Credit SystemarXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026
- Longitudinal and Graph-Augmented Prediction of Adolescent Substance Use Onset in the ABCD StudyarXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026
- OGX: An Open-Source, Vendor-Neutral Generative AI Application ServerarXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026
- An Agentic Framework Using Rules and LLMs for Embedding and Annotating Descriptive Document Layouts: A Plant Science Use CasearXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026