Confidence-Calibrated Inference Expansion for Evaluator-Guided Test-Time Reasoning
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.20836v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluator-guided reasoning presents a local control problem at every step: trust the current answer, return a fallback, or spend more inference. We formulate this choice as a compute-aware three-action controller, scoring terminal actions by predicted answer success and expansion by a rollout-based continuation-success surrogate, with compute cost priced explicitly. A local action-gap analysis characterizes when score errors can change a decision, while an expected regret bound accounts for errors along the realized expansion path. Guided by this analysis, we learn and calibrate action-specific confidence estimates, with local uncertainty penal
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
Related AI news
- IneqAgent: Agentic Inequality Proving in Lean with Symbolic ComputationarXiv cs.AI · October 16, 2026
- L2G-SR: Learning to Guide LLM-based Symbolic RegressionarXiv cs.AI · October 16, 2026
- Learning When to Withdraw: Curriculum Coverage and Rule-Specific Failures in Fine-Tuned Language AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 16, 2026
- Temporal Specification Guidance for Text-to-Video GenerationarXiv cs.AI · October 16, 2026
- LEV: Thinking Fast and Deep with Looped Decision ModelsarXiv cs.AI · October 16, 2026
- StepSafe: Learning Timely Intervention with Context-Aware Safety ReasoningarXiv cs.AI · October 16, 2026