Feedback That Backfires in Games: Do LLM Players Repeat the Move They Just Watched Fail?
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.30205v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When an LLM agent's move fails, the harness writes the move and the failure message into the transcript and asks again. In tool calling, this record makes small models more likely to repeat the failed action. We test whether the same holds in games (Sokoban, Connect Four, Othello), where a move can fail by being illegal or by being legal but losing, both verified exactly. On fixed probe items built by perturbing a correct move, the record backfires: pooled over 8 instruction-tuned models (135M-1.7B) it makes the failed move more likely (corrective gain G = -1.38 nats per token), through the move's surface form, for illegal moves but not for los
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- Chinese state media: DeepSeek and MiniMax completed registration and won approval to open-source and deploy AI models overseas under proposed export controls (Bloomberg)Techmeme · October 23, 2026
- SK Hynix shares rebound after initial drop on scrapped Solidigm IPO plansCNBC Technology · October 23, 2026
- RoleFlow: Self-Evolving Multi-Role Agentic Collaboration via Structural AdaptationarXiv cs.AI · October 23, 2026
- Soft Ontology Priors over Latent Concept Posteriors for Weakly Supervised Neuro-Symbolic LearningarXiv cs.AI · October 23, 2026
- When Stable and Preferred Semantics Agree: A Path-Based ApproacharXiv cs.AI · October 23, 2026
- Route-and-Generate: KL-Regularized Router Improvement for Reasoning Routing in LLMsarXiv cs.AI · October 23, 2026