JusticeAxis: Benchmarking Legal Judgment between Rigid Rule Application and Ungrounded Discretion

arXiv cs.AIen

JusticeAxis: Benchmarking Legal Judgment between Rigid Rule Application and Ungrounded Discretion

arXiv:2610.00353v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A sound judgment applies the law to established facts and weighs the circumstances in which they arose. However, existing methods swing between rigid statute matching and ungrounded discretion, benchmarks score a label or a rubric, and the experience that would supply the balance stays unverified. We formalize legal judgment as a reference-anchored task, whose object is a single decision that stays tied to the statute and to the circumstances at once. We introduce JusticeAxis, 256 real-world criminal cases from 18 countries with audio, image, and text evidence, and three lawyer-written judgments for every case: the recorded one and one for each

This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.

Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI
  • Verktyg
  • Forskning
  • Bild
  • Reglering

Related AI news