Knowing When to Yield: Grounded Arbitration of User Corrections in Text-Based Embodied Agents
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.00282v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How should an embodied agent respond when a person's correction may be wrong? We formulate grounded correction arbitration as a choice among accepting, rejecting, inspecting the world, and asking the speaker. GAVA implements this interface with observation-bounded evidence, legal probes, and a one-step expected-loss rule. In text-only ALFWorld, 162 checkpoints produce 972 paired true and false interventions. Complete local inspections give GAVA and always verify 100 percent correction accuracy, establishing the evidence contract rather than a comparative advantage. In same-episode execution, GAVA reduces interaction cost against always verify b
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- AI is making cyberattacks faster and harder to detect, Interpol warns. Here’s what companies should watchCNBC Technology · October 2, 2026
- ArXiv limits preprint submissions to two per month per submitter, as AI access fuels a record 40,363 submissions in September 2026, vs. 20,569 in September 2024 (Kat Boboris/arXiv)Techmeme · October 2, 2026
- Google's first Suncatcher satellite reaches orbit to test AI chips in spaceDIGITIMES · October 2, 2026
- AutoSynthData: Generating Training Data for Enterprise AgentsHugging Face · October 2, 2026
- Before Agents Decide: Epistemic Action in LLM-Based SystemsarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Heavy-Tailed Memory Traces in Long-Horizon Language AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026