Learning What to Investigate Next: Meta-Reasoning for Long-Horizon Research Agents
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.02525v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon research agents must decide both how to investigate and what to investigate next as evidence accumulates. This is hard to learn because such decisions are sparse in long execution traces, and their consequences may emerge several investigations later. We introduce Meta-reasoning for Iterative Research Agents (MIRA), a hierarchical architecture separating research allocation from execution. An outer-loop meta-reasoner curates context from a persistent research record, then writes a work order for the next investigation or ends the episode. A fresh inner-loop executor carries out each work order, making execution part of the transiti
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- Montag: VW-Partner für autonomes Fahren, Fertiger-Druck auf Notebook-Anbieterheise online – KI · October 5, 2026
- DeepSeek Harness challenges Agent lock-in with Claude Code Mods bridge and open plugin architectureDIGITIMES · October 5, 2026
- World Action Modeling with Progressive Visual PlanningarXiv cs.AI · October 5, 2026
- How to Have a Sensitive Debate: An Instance-Optimal Protocol for AI DebatearXiv cs.AI · October 5, 2026
- Här ger AI-agenter verkliga it-besparingarComputer Sweden · October 5, 2026
- Choosing Before Acting: Comparative Value Estimation for Long-Horizon Tool-Use AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 5, 2026