Mathematical Transfer in LLMs Follows Reasoning Approach More Than Topic
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.00331v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When selecting mathematical training data for LLMs, a natural organizing principle is topic: probability examples for probability targets. An alternative is reasoning approach: worked solutions that share a solution method with the target, even when the mathematical domain differs. We ask which relation produces greater transfer after fine-tuning. We evaluate two counterbalanced $2\times2$ designs: probability and combinatorics crossed with invariant reasoning and double counting (2,000 problems), and number theory and geometry crossed with complement and pigeonhole reasoning (800 problems). In each design, every cell serves as the held-out tar
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
Related AI news
- ArXiv limits preprint submissions to two per month per submitter, as AI access fuels a record 40,363 submissions in September 2026, vs. 20,569 in September 2024 (Kat Boboris/arXiv)Techmeme · October 2, 2026
- LG Uplus, OptAI team up on AI token optimizationTech in Asia · October 2, 2026
- Google's first Suncatcher satellite reaches orbit to test AI chips in spaceDIGITIMES · October 2, 2026
- Before Agents Decide: Epistemic Action in LLM-Based SystemsarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Heavy-Tailed Memory Traces in Long-Horizon Language AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Measuring the Microtask Eligibility Gap: When Is an Off-the-Shelf SLM Enough for an Agent Harness?arXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026