Mitigating Social Sycophancy via Pluralistic Preference Optimization
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.02568v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Personal advice, including relationship advice, now ranks among the most common uses of generative AI. But language models (LMs) exhibit sycophancy: they affirm users much more often than humans do, which can make people overconfident and less willing to repair their relationships after a conflict. Prior work on mitigating sycophancy has focused on factual settings where a response can be checked against a ground truth answer, while mitigations for social sycophancy (e.g., personal advice, where there is no ground truth) have relied on simple prompting and post-training methods with limited effectiveness. Our insight is that social sycophancy o
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
Related AI news
- World Action Modeling with Progressive Visual PlanningarXiv cs.AI · October 5, 2026
- How to Have a Sensitive Debate: An Instance-Optimal Protocol for AI DebatearXiv cs.AI · October 5, 2026
- Choosing Before Acting: Comparative Value Estimation for Long-Horizon Tool-Use AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 5, 2026
- A Multi Method Importance and Performance Efficiency Analysis of Topological Metrics for Natural Visibility Graph Based Cyber Attack DetectionarXiv cs.AI · October 5, 2026
- MintFlow: Minimal Trajectory Intervention for Constrained Flow MatchingarXiv cs.AI · October 5, 2026
- Fast Models, Slow Evidence: A Paired and Self-Audited Evaluation of System-1 Decision Models for LLM Agent HarnessesarXiv cs.AI · October 5, 2026