Same Beliefs, Different Policies: Learning Reusable Representations for Early Stopping in LLM Reasoning
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.30450v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reasoning LLMs often continue reasoning after reaching a correct answer, wasting computation and sometimes replacing it with an incorrect one. Deciding when to stop is a metareasoning problem: the model must weigh what further reasoning could achieve against its cost, given what it can already answer. Direct utility training learns a stopping representation at a chosen token price; supporting new prices can require additional controller training. We introduce BELT (BELief-based Termination), which separates outcome prediction from stopping control. It learns beliefs about current and future answers from a frozen LLM's hidden states, then fits a
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
Related AI news
- RoleFlow: Self-Evolving Multi-Role Agentic Collaboration via Structural AdaptationarXiv cs.AI · October 23, 2026
- Soft Ontology Priors over Latent Concept Posteriors for Weakly Supervised Neuro-Symbolic LearningarXiv cs.AI · October 23, 2026
- When Stable and Preferred Semantics Agree: A Path-Based ApproacharXiv cs.AI · October 23, 2026
- Route-and-Generate: KL-Regularized Router Improvement for Reasoning Routing in LLMsarXiv cs.AI · October 23, 2026
- Diagnosing Personalization Failures in Mobile GUI AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 23, 2026
- Better Reasoning, Not Just Bigger Models: A Structure-Grounded Framework for Efficient and Reliable InferencearXiv cs.AI · October 23, 2026