The Two-Ledger Model: Transaction-Grain Cost Accounting for Multi-Agent AI Systems Across Clouds, Models, and Systems of Record
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2611.06989v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprises run business transactions through multi-agent AI systems spanning clouds, large language models (LLMs), orchestration harnesses, and systems of record. Finance receives AI cost only at settlement grain, aggregated by SKU and charge period. The business question (what did this order, claim, or case cost in AI?) cannot be answered from billing data, because providers never see enterprise transaction boundaries. The FinOps Open Cost and Usage Specification (FOCUS) gives billing data one schema across providers but remains settlement-grain even as it adds AI token and requester attribution. We formalize this grain mismatch, derive seven
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- BlockLock: Reproducible LLM Inference with Fixed Batch GeometryarXiv cs.AI · November 6, 2026
- Don't Prompt Your Agents. Equip Them: Skillware as a Modular Standard for Sovereign, Auditable, and Deterministic Capability Execution for Logical SystemsarXiv cs.AI · November 6, 2026
- Closed-Loop Agent Evaluation: Layered Measurement and Self-CalibrationarXiv cs.AI · November 6, 2026
- Align Before Aggregation: Basis-Consistent Federated LoRA under Heterogeneous RanksarXiv cs.AI · November 6, 2026
- KDASO: Knowledge-Data Dual-Driven Automated Skill Optimization for Liability Adjudication TasksarXiv cs.AI · November 6, 2026
- Adapting the Process of Adaptation: Darwinian, Lamarckian, and Agent-Directed Evolution in AIarXiv cs.AI · November 6, 2026