Toward Safe LLM Agents: A Survey of Specification, Verification, and Enforcement
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2608.14590v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents increasingly perform irreversible real-world actions, including database updates, API calls, file operations, and autonomous use of tools. However, no existing system provides formally grounded, task-level safety guarantees for the plans these agents generate. Research remains fragmented across specification, verification, and enforcement, limiting understanding of the strengths and limitations of existing approaches. To address this gap, we conducted a PRISMA 2020 systematic review of 38 studies published between 2022 and 2026 and retrieved from six academic databases. Our analysis reveals four key findings. First, the specification
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Verktyg
- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- Global AI Regulations for FAIR and Ethics in High-Risk Use Cases: A Comparative ReviewarXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026
- From Doyle to AGM: A Survey and an Implementation Roadmap for Belief ChangearXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026
- Position: Want Better ML Reviews? Stop Asking Nicely and Start Incentivizing with a Credit SystemarXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026
- Longitudinal and Graph-Augmented Prediction of Adolescent Substance Use Onset in the ABCD StudyarXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026
- OGX: An Open-Source, Vendor-Neutral Generative AI Application ServerarXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026
- An Agentic Framework Using Rules and LLMs for Embedding and Annotating Descriptive Document Layouts: A Plant Science Use CasearXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026