Understanding LoRA Rank Trade-offs in Diffusion Model Fine-Tuning
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2609.10656v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Selecting LoRA rank for diffusion fine-tuning requires balancing quality and compute cost. We present a controlled study on CIFAR-10 using a DDPM U-Net with ranks {2,4,8,16,32}, fixed optimization settings, and a reproducible local-folder pytorch-fid protocol. We report FID, trainable parameters, runtime, and GPU memory, then validate trends with extended-budget DDPM runs (20 epochs; ranks 4/8/16) and a Tiny DiT backbone (10 epochs; ranks 4/8/16). Results show moderate ranks are most efficient: rank 4 achieves the best DDPM FID (124.1380), rank 8 is close (124.2136), and higher ranks provide limited gains despite larger adaptation cost. These f
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Bild
Related AI news
- A Multi-Stage Rule-Chaining Framework for Compositional and Interpretable Cognitive ReasoningarXiv cs.AI · September 12, 2026
- CryptoL: Towards Scale Dominance and Physics Constraints Mitigation in Financial Multivariate Time Series ForecastingarXiv cs.AI · September 12, 2026
- Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM WorkflowsarXiv cs.AI · September 12, 2026
- Agentic Share-of-Search: A Multi-Agent AI System for Competitive Decision-Making in LLM-Mediated E-CommercearXiv cs.AI · September 12, 2026
- SemVerBench: Benchmarking LLM Comprehension of Version-Constraint Resolution SemanticsarXiv cs.AI · September 12, 2026
- Debate-to-Skill: Capability-Bound Process Supervision for Industrial Query-to-Agent AnnotationarXiv cs.AI · September 12, 2026