What Do Rationales Communicate? A Message-Intervention Study in Role-Specialized QA
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.00018v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Role-specialized QA pipelines increasingly pass rationales from a reasoner to a verifier, but it is unclear what this message actually buys: better answers, stronger support assessment, or a new failure surface. We introduce a message-intervention diagnostic that fixes the evidence and candidate answer while varying only the rationale passed across the reasoner-to-verifier boundary. On 400 MuSiQue, HotpotQA, and 2WikiMultiHopQA examples with DeepSeek as generator and verifier, faithful rationales add almost no answer accuracy over no rationale, while corrupted rationales strongly alter support judgments. Under a blind verifier prompt, harmless
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- DeepSeek
- Forskning
Related AI news
- ArXiv limits preprint submissions to two per month per submitter, as AI access fuels a record 40,363 submissions in September 2026, vs. 20,569 in September 2024 (Kat Boboris/arXiv)Techmeme · October 2, 2026
- Google's first Suncatcher satellite reaches orbit to test AI chips in spaceDIGITIMES · October 2, 2026
- Before Agents Decide: Epistemic Action in LLM-Based SystemsarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Heavy-Tailed Memory Traces in Long-Horizon Language AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Measuring the Microtask Eligibility Gap: When Is an Off-the-Shelf SLM Enough for an Agent Harness?arXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- EviGraph: Proof-Carrying Selective Recommendation over Temporal Public-Service Knowledge GraphsarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026