Whose Ground Truth? Embracing Ambiguity in Human-Centered AI
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2610.10805v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI systems increasingly interact with people and make decisions about them, understanding human interpretations becomes an important part of developing human-centered AI. Conventional machine learning and AI systems are largely developed under the assumption that a single definitive ground truth exists, with variability in human annotations often resolved through aggregation or treated as noise. However, for many human-centered tasks, human interpretation is inherently ambiguous, and multiple interpretations of the same input may be simultaneously reasonable and valid. Reducing such ambiguity to a single target risks overlooking meaningful i
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
Related AI news
- On the Clock: Towards Punctual and Productive Time-Budgeted AI AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 9, 2026
- How Narrative Wrapping Affects LLM Refusal: A Cross-Language Benchmark and DefensearXiv cs.AI · October 9, 2026
- Curating Always-Loaded Context for LLM Agents: A Capacitated Assortment Model with Censored FeedbackarXiv cs.AI · October 9, 2026
- AgentHorizon: Evaluating Agentic Judges for Long-Horizon Computer-Use TasksarXiv cs.AI · October 9, 2026
- When Lower Reconstruction Loss Hurts: Distributionally Robust Refinement for Low-Bit LLM QuantizationarXiv cs.AI · October 9, 2026
- Plan-and-Patch: Diffusion Language Models for Agentic PlanningarXiv cs.AI · October 9, 2026