Worse Together: How Performance Breaks Down in Multi-User Multi-Agent Teams
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2610.00583v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: People are increasingly delegating tasks to AI agents, and those agents are increasingly encountering other people's agents over shared resources such as a codebase, a calendar, or a budget. When each agent acts for a different user with different goals, coordination often fails, and the group ends up worse off than if a single agent had acted for everyone. We study this multi-user, multi-agent setting across five frontier models and 77 scenarios in four environments: an API key environment in which agents share a compute budget, a clinic in which they share a calendar, a personal assistant environment in which they share a group order or booki
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
- Agenter
Related AI news
- AI is making cyberattacks faster and harder to detect, Interpol warns. Here’s what companies should watchCNBC Technology · October 2, 2026
- ArXiv limits preprint submissions to two per month per submitter, as AI access fuels a record 40,363 submissions in September 2026, vs. 20,569 in September 2024 (Kat Boboris/arXiv)Techmeme · October 2, 2026
- Google's first Suncatcher satellite reaches orbit to test AI chips in spaceDIGITIMES · October 2, 2026
- AutoSynthData: Generating Training Data for Enterprise AgentsHugging Face · October 2, 2026
- Before Agents Decide: Epistemic Action in LLM-Based SystemsarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026
- Heavy-Tailed Memory Traces in Long-Horizon Language AgentsarXiv cs.AI · October 2, 2026