GRAIL: From Saliency to Semantics in Time-Series Explanation
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv cs.AI
AI Global WirearXiv:2610.29036v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Explaining a time-series model requires both locating the evidence and extracting meaningful knowledge from it. Yet a single timestep is not a semantic unit: the meaningful patterns live across many samples, not in any one of them. Per-timestep saliency is therefore noisy, high-dimensional, and unstable. Existing methods address this by introducing fixed-size windows and treating them as independent players in a cooperative game. Evaluating a coalition of such players requires defining a ``baseline'' region, which prior work tackles with fixed counterfactuals (e.g., a flat line, noise, or a spectral surrogate). This choice frequently dominates
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
Related AI news
- Pioneers Across Europe Deploy NVIDIA Earth-2 Open Models to Power Real-World Weather and Climate PredictionNVIDIA Blog · October 22, 2026
- OpenAI acquires Orchestra Bio to advance AI drug developmentDIGITIMES · October 22, 2026
- DiffResearch: Accelerating Deep Research with Diffusion Language ModelsarXiv cs.AI · October 22, 2026
- To Manipulate or Not: Opinion Dynamics in LLM InteractionsarXiv cs.AI · October 22, 2026
- Simply Logical -- The First Three DecadesarXiv cs.AI · October 22, 2026
- Fig: Automated Multiagent Behavior ElicitorarXiv cs.AI · October 22, 2026