When Uncertainty Isn't Enough: An Empirical Study of Self-Correction in Code Generation
arXiv cs.AIen
arXiv:2608.14659v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models for code generation often produce incorrect solutions without reliable indicators of failure. We study whether uncertainty estimation methods developed for natural language transfer to code generation, and whether such signals can improve code generation via selective self-correction. We evaluate five uncertainty methods: mean token entropy, verbalized confidence, $P(\text{True})$, entropy ensembles, and semantic entropy probes, across three small code LLMs on HumanEval and BigCodeBench. We find that multi-sample $P(\text{True})$ achieves the strongest correlation with correctness, while all the other methods, including se
This is a short summary published by AI Global Wire. The full article is owned and hosted by arXiv cs.AI — open it there to read it in full.
Read the full story at arXiv cs.AI- Forskning
Related AI news
- Global AI Regulations for FAIR and Ethics in High-Risk Use Cases: A Comparative ReviewarXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026
- From Doyle to AGM: A Survey and an Implementation Roadmap for Belief ChangearXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026
- Position: Want Better ML Reviews? Stop Asking Nicely and Start Incentivizing with a Credit SystemarXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026
- Longitudinal and Graph-Augmented Prediction of Adolescent Substance Use Onset in the ABCD StudyarXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026
- An Agentic Framework Using Rules and LLMs for Embedding and Annotating Descriptive Document Layouts: A Plant Science Use CasearXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026
- Toward Safe LLM Agents: A Survey of Specification, Verification, and EnforcementarXiv cs.AI · August 18, 2026